The opposite of an abbreviated mind is a metacognitive empowered consciousness, or MEC. The words metacognitive and consciousness as they are paired here might strike some as close to synonymous and therefore nearly redundant.  The important difference between the two within this context is the potential passivity that may be associated with the fluid qualities of an undirected consciousness that is not actively engaged in its own reinforcement. 

The modern person who ignores the metacognition alternative by neglecting to fortify his or her capacities for informed responsiveness––as with life-affirming values, ethics-centered convictions, knowledge of self, and awareness of the changing contemporary world-- is more likely to fall prey to rhetoric based on xenophobic hatred or megalomaniacal delusions. Or: to general emotional instability susceptible to the deeper forms of depression and to self-destruction.

This is not a matter of wielding superhero-like telepathic or telekinetic abilities. Consciousness empowered by enhanced metacognition may be defined as a developed or natural capacity for assessing the complex variables of your particular era and environment––as well as your own place and adopted function within them. These variables in the 21st century would include factors like the previously-noted shifting demographics, evolving economic trends, and cultural confluences on levels ranging from the personal to the global.

The capacity to make such an assessment enables a person to consider, act on, or respond to issues that impact his or her life without with minimal distortions caused by fear or incomprehension. To take action or not to take action in the face of nearly-overwhelming change does not become a question but an option based on informed mindfulness.

How an abbreviated mind or MEC is most likely to manifest in terms of particular actions depends on the individual in question. It does not take long to determine whether an abbreviated mind or a metacognitive empowered one is at work behind the most dramatic headlines read in a newspaper or on the internet.

The documented activities of an abbreviated mind will most likely cause you to groan with pain or wince from embarrassment. The reported undertakings of an MEC may very well prompt a moment of awed admiration, friendly envy, or smiling approval.

The number and types of disadvantages of approaching life with an abbreviated mind compared to the advantages of engaging it with metacognitive empowerment may vary from individual to individual.  Below are two lists featuring five potential outcomes based on each type. These should be read as one set of examples rather than as definitive conclusive attributes:

As you can see, there is room for flexibility, expansion, and/or contraction in both sets of examples when it comes to implementing the idea of an abbreviated mind versus metacognitive empowered consciousness.

The concept of metacognitive empowerment is not new. It is, however, too often neglected where everyday living in an increasingly globalized highly-technologized world is concerned.

For more discussions of the costs of neglecting to develop a metacognitive empowered consciousness please check out future installments of this blog and look for news of the planned book title, The Boy with the Guerrilla Decontextualized Eyes.

NEXT: Summer 2016 Update.

Aberjhani
© Bright Skylark Literary Productions
May 2016

No great amount of harm is done when a Millennial and a Traditionalist find themselves engaging in a passionate conversation about “catfishing” only to realize in the end that they were talking about two different things. Once the Traditionalist (a member of the generation born from 1900-1945) realizes her young debater is talking about avoiding online dating catfish scams, her frustrated tones then make a lot more sense. Once the Millennial (a member of the generation born from 1981-2000) understands the Traditionalist is referring to memories of catching catfish with her father in the rivers of Alabama and later cooking them for dinner, her cheerful attitude then makes more sense.

The above scenario represents a good example of how applications of language can evolve from one decade to the next and take its meaning from a generational context. It demonstrates as well how a lack of awareness regarding such evolutions can contribute to the stagnation of an abbreviated mind. At the same time, it represents a good illustration of what Nigerian novelist Chimamanda Ngozi Adichi refers to as “the danger of a single story” in her popular TEDx Talks video. In the presentation, Adichi recounts how the human tendency to focus on one facet of a situation, or of a person’s life, can lead to false assumptions and misconceptions.

The author acknowledged there had been times in her youth when she too had been guilty of reducing people’s lives to a single incomplete story. The problem with this tendency became more and more apparent when she later she traveled outside of Nigeria. Many people seemed to assume she had grown up impoverished and illiterate when in fact her childhood had been a relatively comfortable one and she had started reading at an early age.

Whereas a single incomplete story can often lead to insults and polarization, she observes the following:

A person with an abbreviated mind would be more likely to tell “a single story” as opposed to connecting multiple stories that create a composite whole. The reason why is not hard to understand. Single stories, like the sound bites and video clips used in guerrilla decontextualization smear campaigns against politicians, celebrities, and victims of cyber-bullying, support the excuses and delusions upon which abbreviated minds casually feed. They help them escape any sense of accountability for actions they know are harmful to others.  

Going back now to the interesting example of catfishing: the abbreviated awareness in such a case comes from refusing, or neglecting, to acknowledge the fact that ours is an era in which more generations than ever before are simultaneously actively engaged in different aspects of social and professional pursuits.  Traditionalists born before 1945, Baby Boomers born afterwards (1946-1964), their Generation X offspring, and the more recently-arrived Millennials may feel sometimes within each other’s company like displaced strangers in a very peculiar land.  

Members of each generational group have been shaped by experiences and values that make it important for them to understand the differences, similarities, and vocabularies created by their unique era-defined culture. Because these multiple generations are sharing work space in offices, grocery stores, community centers, hospitals, college campuses, and elsewhere it is important to expand one’s knowledge about each. What, for example, makes one generation tick like a flawless vintage gold pocket watch, or causes another to simply shut down like an android humanoid suddenly deprived of its power source?

The destiny of the current generations, to paraphrase Franklin D. Roosevelt when speaking about his own while accepting re-nomination for the presidency on June 27, 1936, involves a great deal more than constructing pathways of understanding leading from one age-group’s idiosyncratic preferences to another’s. They also include the huge demographic racial, behavioral, ethnic shifts taking place as people from countries all over the world immigrate to different nations. Some, like the Asians and Latinos who continue to swell the United States’ population, make the move in search of better economic opportunities and greater political freedom. Others, like those in Syria, Nigeria, Afghanistan, and various realms ravaged by military conflict across the globe, make their way to neighboring countries just to themselves and their families alive.

In regard to the United States, more and more political and economic forecasters have begun examining the potential impact of the current shifts in racial demographics.  They prompt an important question: As the dominant numbers which have characterized and empowered the status of one particular group for centuries begins to dwindle, how are people of different national origins and socially-constructed racial categories likely to respond?

Coming up next: What does voting for Elvis Presley or Michael Jackson have to do with it?

(© 2015) Aberjhani